|

|
Who Is The Healer?
The Locus of Healing In Energy Psychotherapy
Asha Clinton, MSW, PhD
From my perspective, Larry Nims presents the most interesting and provocative
assertions about why the energy psychotherapies work (see his workbook, the
Be Set Free Fast Training Manual). Completely bypassing physical explanations,
he says that it is the subconscious that does the healing, and that we can ally
ourselves and our clients with their subconscious? through muscle testing and
the thorough removal of reversals.
My experience has been that he is absolutely correct, although I will
call it the unconscious here, since I came of age in the Jungian tradition.
When I muscle
test a client, saying, "Unconscious of John, you are willing to heal John of the
memory of his mother's death," someone or something usually answers yes.
Then when I test, "You are willing to do this with Instant BSSF (or, as things
have developed, with Larry's permission, Instant Matrix)," again, something may
answer no. "You are willing to do this with Seemorg Matrix Work." Someone
may answer yes.
Having used muscle testing for a number of years now, and having heard
various innovators in energy psychotherapy say they are muscle testing either
the body or the subconscious, I have become curious about who or what is
responding to our muscle testing. Since I am not enlivened by explanations
regarding the physics of energy psychology, I've gone back to Jung, Hinduism,
Buddhism, and Sufism to answer this question for myself. Perhaps such an
answer will be of interest to you as well.
To begin with, it is posited in Hinduism and Sufism that there are two
basic forms of the Divine. The first, which the Hindus call Brahman,
is the Deity
which is coextensive with the universe, which is the universe and which,
dwelling everywhere, is everything. It consists of all the possible qualities,
attributes, things, and beings. It is the totality.
The second, which the Hindus call Atman, is the spark of the Divine,
which can be found at the center of each human being. Microcosm to the
Brahman's
macrocosm, the Atman has the same contents as the Brahman, an interesting
paradox, to say the least.
Jung, whose thinking was influenced by both Hinduism and Buddhism,
described two different levels of the unconscious: the collective unconscious
and the personal unconscious. In the collective unconscious, he placed
all the
archetypes that have arisen as humanity has evolved (see C.G. Jung, Two
Essays in Analytic Psychology). Some of these archetypes are anthropomorphic
forms, which contain the perfect totality of qualities inherent in a
certain way of being, like Kali or Shiva in Hinduism, or the Christ in
Christianity.
They
exemplify groups of related qualities, which are both Divine and human.
The Divine level of these qualities is whole and perfect whereas the
human...
well, you all know about human imperfection.
The Witch archetype, for example, who wants power more than anything
else, who controls, manipulates, casts spells, and destroys connection
with other
people and with oneself, also contains creativity, insight, intuition, and
esoteric qualities such as clairvoyance and psychic ability, and as such, is a
channel to the Divine (see Ann and Barry Ulanov, The Witch and the Clown).
The King archetype rules, either benevolently or not, stands above others, and
has a strong Divine connection. And we all know the Inner Child.
Other kinds of archetypes are the perfection of relational patterns,
for example, the family, marriage, the mother-daughter relationship,
the
corporate hierarchy. Still others are states of being which are not
necessarily anthropomorphized: peace, war, death, birth, spiritual union,
and the like (see
Anthony Stevens, Archetypes).
Jung believed that all the psychological material we develop unknowingly
as we live our lives is located in the personal unconscious. Furthermore,
he
showed-- and this is clear from the experiences of many Jungian analysands,
myself included-- that although any archetype may sleep unawakened
throughout a person's lifetime, an individual's life experience may
awaken an archetype into activity. For example, the experience of a
harshly judgmental,
critical, and blaming mother will not only awaken the Judge archetype
into activity in a boy's psyche; that Judge archetype will constellate
in its negative
form, as harshly judging, critical, and blaming. Then, analysis may
move it into consciousness. In fact, this is what happens in a great
many Jungian analyses.
Jung felt that the Self is the most all-encompassing of the archetypes.
It contains all the other archetypes, he said, and is the center and
circumference
of the psyche. He added that it rules the entire psyche, whereas
the ego rules only the conscious mind (see Jung, Psychological Types).
He spoke of its vastness the way mystics speak of the Divine. He
was,
of course, speaking about the Atman, the Divine essence that resides
within every
human being and is capable of joining with the Brahman during mystical
experiences, epiphanies, prayer, meditation, spiritual practice,
and for some lucky souls, in everyday life. It is that part of us which is sublime.
If we add these not-so-disparate pieces from Hinduism, Buddhism, Sufism
and Jung to the energy psychotherapies, we come to a wonderful conclusion:
When
we muscle test our clients or ourselves, we are asking the Atman,
the Self, the Higher Self-- whatever name we wish to give this-- to respond
to us and,
ultimately, to do the healing. It follows from this, of course,
that it is the Self, i.e., God, who is the inner healer.
Some of you may question this, believing that it is the body that
we are muscle testing, but this belief arises from the fallacy that
the body is somehow
separate from the psyche and the spirit. This tripartite division--
body, psyche, spirit-- is a cultural construct which is only some hundreds
of years old in the
West, and which does not even enter thinking in most other traditions
of wisdom. We could call it a form of culturally conceptualized dissociation,
and
not be far from the truth.
It amazes me that, when we muscle test, we are talking to God,
and God is answering!! One of my spiritual teachers once told me that
the full definition
of prayer is talking to God-- creating connection and dialogue
with God through language. With muscle testing, George Goodheart discovered
a modern form of
prayer which included a way for God to answer us in a manner
we could somewhat understand(see George Goodheart, Applied Kinesiology
1975
Workshop Procedure Manual).
Most important, God is the real healer in each of us. The religious
precedents
for this are multiple, of course. They are expressed in the symbolism
of both Christ's and the Buddha's healing people, in Divine healing
in many traditions,
and in the cross-culturally ubiquitous definition of various
forms of healing as aspects of religion or mysticism. Perhaps the energy
that
energy
psychotherapists are so interested in and that many practitioners
feel coursing through their client's bodies as they do TFT. EFT, TAT,
BSFF, or Seemorg Matrix
Work is, in fact, Divine energy. I do not doubt this for a minute.
What are the implications of this for the energy psychotherapies? The
first grows out of the nature of the archetypes and how they are given
life by the
experience of individuals. If, for example, a small child is
sexually abused by her father, the archetype of the father that develops
in her personal
unconscious has a pedophilic element, a selfish one, a using
one, an uncaring one, and more, depending on her father's qualities as
they are expressed in his
relationship with her and with other family members. This suggests
that the Divine whole takes in, develops and/or contains negative elements
which
require transformation, that the Divine desires transformation
and growth just as many human beings do. Since the unconscious almost
always answers yes
when we ask, through muscle testing, whether it will help us
heal a particular issue, it seems to me that the Divine wants to heal
Itself as well as us, or at
least the parts of It that reside in human beings.
This means, in turn, that the energy psychotherapies need to
develop protocols for clearing and transforming the archetypes themselves.
These offer the best
opportunity for healing some of our more damaged clients. I
have been hard at work for some months now on the Matrix version.
Moreover, once we have the agreement of the Atman that healing
is to take place, it is quite possible that no modality or technique
at all is needed as long
as the conscious mind believes that the Atman has the power
to heal the person in which it resides. Larry Nims' Instant BSFF comes
close
to this in that,
once reversals have been cleared, all that is required for
healing is the saying of a single word, the "healing word" that the client has chosen. Having used
Instant Matrix with a number of clients who are children, I was confronted with
the fact that words like "Fudgey" (one boy's teddy bear) and "Leonardo
DiCaprio" (a teenage girl's choice) worked as well as adult choices such as
"Perfect Healing", "Bevy of blondes", and "TGIF". Furthermore, in developing
the Matrix version of Instant BSFF, I have treated myself just by taking a deep
breath; no healing word was necessary.
This suggests that the agreement of the conscious mind and the Self
that healing will now occur, along with the conscious mind's faith that
the
unconscious can, in fact, heal, may be all that is necessary
on the part of the client. I would add that the therapist's belief that
the Atman can heal in this
way, coupled with her intentionality that it do so, are probably
what is needed on the part of the therapist.
Having said all this, I must return to the sad fact that we
live in a world that is filled with doubt, skepticism, disbelief, bitterness,
lack of faith and hope, and
that many of us and most of our clients share these qualities
to some degree. This makes the energy protocols, with their tapping,
holding, points, and
energy centers, our explanations of the physics involved,
very valuable; for many people, they are easier to believe in than a
bit of
muscle testing and
reversal clearing followed by a big and obvious change. I
have had at least one client who would not do Tapas Fleming's elegant
TAT,
where the only obvious
processing is the holding of a few acupressure points and
Chakra centers. Frightened, he said it was voodoo because it worked so
simply
and well.
Furthermore, this way of thinking about energy psychotherapy
suggests that, with many clients, the first thing to treat may be precisely
the doubt,
skepticism, disbelief, bitterness, lack of faith and hope
that make it necessary to use longer rather than shorter clearing protocols,
that these, by themselves,
are reversals as primary as those that TFT, EFT, BSFF, and
Seemorg Matrix Work already focus on.
Whether they use the healing menus like those offered by
modalities
like Holographic Repatterning and sing some of their clients to health,
whether
they exhort them to tap, hold, breathe, or say healing
words, the energy psychotherapies all rely on the unconscious to provide
the
healing; and the
unconscious we ultimately rely on is God.
Next Article
© 1999 Nahoma Clinton. All Rights Reserved |